From the bottom of my heart - thank you.
With your help, our grassroots campaign for New York State
Assembly was successful. Thank you for volunteering, for
donating your time, energy and money. For telling your stories
about why my candidacy mattered to you. Thank you for believing that public service and good government matter. Thank you for believing in me. And thank you for voting.
So many people helped make this victory happen.
Thank you to Assemblywoman Joan Millman, Congresswoman
Nydia Velazquez, Senator Velmanette Montgomery, US Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, NYC Comptroller Scott Stringer, NYC Public Advocate Tish James, Assemblyman Jim Brennan, Councilmembers Carlos Menchaca, Antonio Reynoso, Rosie Mendez and Helen Rosenthal, and so many others for your leadership, support and guidance and for taking that leap with me.
Thank you to my campaign team led by Paul Nelson and John Longo, and ably assisted by David Czyzyk and Ptahra Jeppe.
And now, the hard work begins. I look forward to working with you all to address the urgent issues that face our communities, our city and the great state of New York.
MORE ABOUT JO ANNE GET INVOLVED
April 15, 2015 - School-to-School Dialogue on High Stakes Testing
April 6, 2015
Statement on Teacher Evaluations Included in the 2015 State Budget
April 4, 2015
My initial statement in response to the budget negotiated by the Governor, Assembly and Senate wasn't as clear as it should have been on teacher evaluations. First, it is important people understand some key elements. The bill that included the education budget and teacher evaluations was not a stand-alone bill. It also included ethics reform - reforms affecting attorneys in particular. As a former teacher I fully understand the concerns that parents and teachers have voiced. As an attorney I believe the ethics reform provisions are critically important to restoring the public's trust, especially in the wake of cases we've seen of late.
The Governor's proposal for teacher evaluations would have evaluations done by a commission that he would oversee and linked education funding to the passage of his entire education package - including for example, Education Investment Tax Credits for millionaire hedge funders. Under New York's constitution, the Governor has enormous powers - the budget must come from him, and the legislature has but two choices: accept or reject. A rejection would empower the Governor to enact his plan through a unilateral budget extender (essentially an Executive order that you can read more about in this article by Peter Goodman in "Ed in the Apple"), something my Assembly colleagues and I believed to be far worse.
For many reasons I've cited before, the Assembly Majority rejected the Governor's proposal in its Assembly one-house bill budget bill passed earlier in March. I have been very vocal in my belief that policy should not be embedded into the budget and that teacher evaluations should not include student test scores at all. Unfortunately, because of federal Race to the Top provisions, the legislature did so in 2011. That was not the linkage to which I referred and I should have been clearer.
From joint Senate-Assembly conference committees and negotiations with the Governor emerged the plan included in the budget whereby school districts will still be responsible for conducting their own evaluations under parameters developed by the state Board of Regents. Senate Education Chair John Flanagan defended the provisions passed this past week acknowledging that it reduces the emphasis on testing.
Is this a perfect answer? No! Is it the final answer? Not even close! But in my view, neither the Governor nor the legislature should be picking teacher evaluation weights. That is why the Regents' involvement at this level is a better approach.
The budget is not and should not be the final word on this process, but rather one step towards providing our children with an education that helps all our students achieve their potential in an increasingly competitive world.